FTMO 50K (2-Step Challenge) vs FundedNext Stellar 2-Step 100K
Same trading style, both firms, side by side — ranked by what actually matters: net expected value after fees and payout splits, not raw pass rate.
Side by side
| FTMO 50K (2-Step Challenge) | FundedNext Stellar 2-Step 100K | |
| Account size | $50,000 | $100,000 |
| Profit target | $5,000 | $8,000 |
| Max drawdown | $5,000 | $10,000 |
| Drawdown type | Static | Static |
| Payout split | 80% | 90% |
| Total upfront | $375 | $549 |
| Pass rate (52% WR, 1.5:1) | 100% | 100% |
| Net EV (per attempt) | $6,400 | $7,200 |
Assumes a standard 52% win rate at 1.5:1 reward-to-risk, $200 risk per trade, and an $8,000 average funded-phase profit. On that profile, FundedNext Stellar 2-Step 100K has the higher net expected value.
Compare for your own style →Read more
Analytics, not financial advice. Net-EV figures are simulated for a stated standard
profile and will differ from your results. Confirm current rules with each firm before paying.